From
Economy . hu
How do you comment the results of the last general elections in Hungary?polls proved accurate. The vast majority achieved by the FIDESZ (an acronym for Federation of Young Democrats) resembles that of the Socialists in 1994. In this position, can keep FIDESZ Jobbik control the opposition, a party in my view even more worrying than the MIEP of István Csurka, the formation of right-wing born in the nineties which has gradually taken the place, at least in part. Jobbik mainly concerned with some of the statements, such as the fact that Israel is opposed to investment in Hungary since too many, while others have more, such as Germany, Holland and Austria, and are not contested this. In similar positions Jobbik echoes a nefarious past, Hungary has unfortunately experienced.
FIDESZ aspires to be a European-style Christian Democrat party. Its leader, Viktor Orban, has good relations with Angela Merkel and maintains excellent with Berlusconi. He had also with the recently deceased President of the Republic of Poland Lech Kaczynski (victim of the plane crash in Russia 10 April 2010) and can be expected that they will also have the new president will be elected soon. I think that will continue a positive relationship with Sarkozy on the horizon and I see no problems with Putin, or the winner of the next British elections. What are the key issues that the new government will face? In economic policy there are major problems. To expect to enter the Euro, Hungary needs to work hard. There is a saying Hungarian to distinguish different periods of history, "és Kényszerpálya mozgástér. We could translate it as "fixed course or scope." At this time Hungary can not afford to largheggiare, is facing a set course. FIDESZ can not stray far from the route taken by the previous Socialist governments. The rhetoric of FIDESZ certainly is very different from that of the socialist MSZP, but economic policy will not change much. These measures include further price increases in several areas, ranging from school fees and university health.
What led to the defeat of the socialist MSZP? I am convinced that MSZP lost to a problem of transparency. The party has not had the courage to talk about the condition of the country before the elections. I refer to 2006, when the then Socialist Prime Minister Ferenc Gyurcsány has admitted to the Hungarian people against the economic conditions of the country, but it did so behind closed doors instead. In an internal meeting of the party, Gyurcsány spoke with bright tones of the severe economic conditions in Hungary and said he had lied during the election campaign. His speech was then made known through a tip-off to the press, which caused a major scandal and a growing mistrust of the center-left. I believe that the MSZP has failed in this, more that on economic policy. What do you need now, Hungary? recovery. Hungary should join the euro area can not afford to lag behind its neighbors. A former Soviet bloc country that manages to place alongside the rest of Europe at the political level, but fails to do the same in economic terms represents a paradox. I think it is necessary to continue with the reform of the country, particularly in some sectors of the welfare state, creating a system in which costs and benefits are in balance.
how to live, according to her, the five parties that will make the Parliament?
There will certainly be verbal confrontations, too heavy, but perhaps nothing more serious. The Hungarian political dirsene love of all colors, but they are good at creating political stability. As demonstrated by the last two decades, in which there never was a crisis of government and in return we saw a significant alternation in power.
Where might get a turn to slow down the Hungarian distrust in politics?
Need transparency. Only with this ingredient in the relationship between politics and the public will improve. We will see how will this new government. Federigo Argentieri Federigo Argentieri Guarini directs the Institute and teaches Contemporary History and Politics International at John Cabot University
and Temple University Rome Campus. Graduated in Political Sciences at the University "La Sapienza" of Rome, Federigo Argentieri has since earned a Ph.D. in Modern and Contemporary History at the 'University of Sciences Eötvös Lorand (ELTE) in Budapest . From 1994 to 2001 he taught History of Eastern Europe at the Faculty of Political Sciences "Cesare Alfieri" in Florence. Co-founder, in 1989, the Institute for the History of the Hungarian Revolution of 1956, in 2005 he was awarded the Cross of Merit of the Republic of Hungary media. Among his publications, the book published by Marsilio
"Budapest 1956 - the revolution slandered."
Claudia Lepore, Economia.hu
Original article
All products made with consciousness, with talent, with love for their land and above all with passion, are worthy of consideration and can rise to excellence. The